Local roundup: Connellsville boys close season with win
Joe Beucher scored a game-high 15 points to lead the Connellsville boys basketball team to a season-ending 59-44 victory over host Albert Gallatin in a Section 1-AAAA game Friday. Jade Maher tallied 12 points, and Trent Bauer was next with 11 points for the Falcons (7-15, 3-9).
Josh Zidek paced the Colonials (1-21, 0-12) with 13 points, and Chris Uphold scored 11 points.
Uniontown 67, Laurel Highlands 53 — Jordan Pratt scored 21 points, and Deondre Winfrey netted 17 points as the Red Raiders (16-3, 10-2) defeated Laurel Highlands in Section 3-AAA. Uniontown and Laurel Highlands finished in a tie for first place in the section.
Joe Pegg scored 17 points, and Michael Hooper added 10 points for the Mustangs (15-6, 10-2).
Geibel 65, Avella 62 — Aaron Agostoni scored 41 points as the Gators (3-16, 2-8) closed their season with a Section 3-A win over visiting Avella.
Brandon Miller led the Eagles (3-17, 1-9) with 17 points. A.J. Keenan and Bill McKee each scored 11 points.
Brownsville 87, Frazier 43— Tre Durkin and Cole Novotney each scored 16 points as Brownsville (16-5, 11-3) defeated visiting Frazier in Section 5-AA. Mike Murdock and Nick Despot each scored 11 points.
Charles Manack led the Commodores (6-14, 4-10) with eight points.
Freshman boys basketball
Laurel Highlands 46, Connellsville 35 — Corey Fogle scored 12 points, but the Falcons (8-8) were defeated by visiting Laurel Highlands. Jim Cellurale and Colby Shipley each scored six points.
Don Zuckelkowski scored 13 points, and Jake Swartz scored 11 points for Laurel Highlands.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.