Local roundup: Cheswick Christian advances to title game
Thanks to Thursday's win over Neighborhood Academy, the Cheswick Christian Academy boys basketball team has a chance to avenge a rare loss — and claim hardware in the process.
Cheswick Christian (20-6, 14-0) topped Neighborhood Academy, 59-36, in the Southwest Christian Athletic Conference semifinals to earn a spot in the championship game, where it will meet Harvest Baptist, the team that handed Cheswick Christian its only loss in its last 16 games.
The finals begin at 7 p.m. Saturday at Penn State New Kensington.
Antione Malloy scored 24 points to lead a trio of scorers in double figures for Cheswick Christian, which led, 35-21, at halftime. Ian Swartz added 14 points, and Tyler Knupp followed with 12.
David Ingram scored 14 points to lead Neighborhood Academy.
Plum 4, Kiski Area 0 — James Borriello and Taylor Cestra split time in net to share the shutout for Plum (8-9-1). Borriello made 15 saves, while Cestra had four.
David Stonebraker scored two goals in the Class-AA matchup, while Joe Randazzo scored one goal and added two assists.
Ben Crawford finished with 22 saves for Kiski Area (4-13).
Freeport 8, Bishop McCort 1 — Cole Hepler scored two goals and added an assist as Freeport (15-4-1) cruised by Bishop McCort (3-18) in Class A action. Gregory Newman added a goal and an assist, while Michael Frazetta finished with a goal and two assists. Katie Hill made six saves in net.
Ford City 14, Connellsville 0 — Seven different players scored for Ford City (16-2-1) in the Open Class win. Jesse Valasek tallied four goals and three assists, while Joe Cippel had a goal and five assists.
Thomas Clark had 44 saves for Connellsville (1-18).
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.