Knights girls fifth; Trump third at states
Bowlers from Norwin, Penn-Trafford and Franklin Regional all bowled well but came up short of a title at the 2013 Pennsylvania State High School Bowling Championships at the 222 Dutch Lanes in Ephrata last Thursday and Friday.
Norwin's girls team missed out on the stepladder knockout rounds in the team competition by 16 pins, as they placed fifth out of 12 teams with a total of 3,870.
Taylor Trump led the Knights with a 667 series, and she was followed by Brianna Lundy (596), Brooke Lundy (534), Jules Goehring (533) and Dori Miller (440). The team combined for two Baker sets of 506 and 594 to complete their team score.
Reaching the stepladder were Hempfield, Wilson-West Lawn, Butler and Penn Manor, and Butler triumphed in the three-game final match over Hempfield, 2-1.
Trump would make her way into a stepladder tournament in the second day's singles competition, as her six-game total of 1,262 placed her third out of 24 girls. Her score placed her directly into the quarterfinals, but she was knocked off there by Aerika High of Manheim Central, 229-197.
Also in the girls singles competition was Penn-Trafford's Amanda Balas. She placed 12th with a six-game total of 1,111, which left her 77 pins out of the stepladder playoff.
In the boys competition, Franklin Regional's Harrison Thatcher placed 17th with his score of 1,149, which left him 123 pins away from the stepladder.
The individual state titles both went to western Pennsylvania bowlers, as Hempfield's Justyne Falbo took the girls title and Wilson Christian Academy's Brendan Schink won the boys crown.
— Staff report
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.