While cancer patient Kurt Wolfe was having trouble with a clogged port during chemotherapy treatments, he kept thinking about the game.
“That was wasting time,” Wolfe, the Pine-Richland baseball coach, said of the potentially life-saving procedures. “I was running late.”
But Wolfe never missed a game through four years of treatment and three surgeries on his liver, colon and thyroid. While doctors gave him a 25 percent chance of survival, he somehow found the strength to lead Pine-Richland to the 2010 WPIAL championship, hours after a chemo session.
For his efforts while fighting stage IV colorectal cancer and keeping up a coach's demanding schedule, Wolfe is the WPIAL's 2013 Courage Award winner. Wolfe will be honored at the Hall of Fame banquet and induction ceremony June 7 at the Green Tree Doubletree Hotel.
The day of the port malfunction also was the day of a semifinal game against Upper St. Clair at Washington & Jefferson's field. “I kept telling the chemo nurse to hurry up. (She said) ‘This is more important.' And she was right. But I wanted to get there.”
Weak from the chemo, Wolfe let his father drive to the game.
“I, literally, got there as soon as the game started and ran right onto third base (the coaching box),” he said.
Pine-Richland won, and a few days later defeated North Allegheny in the championship game. It was Wolfe's second title after leading Pine-Richland to WPIAL and PIAA championships in 2006, his rookie year as coach.Today, Wolfe said the cancer is “stable,” and he continues to coach. “It was his medicine,” his wife Jennifer said.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.