Share This Page

Hampton boys lacrosse rallies past Pine-Richland

| Wednesday, April 24, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Louis Raggiunti | Pine Creek Journal
Hampton attacker Andy DeMichiei tries to work his way through the Pine-Richland defense. DeMichiei scored two late goals, including the game-winner in overtime.
Louis Raggiunti | Pine Creek Journal
Pine-Richland's Joey Briski looks for an open man. Briski scored a goal against Hampton in the first half.

This season is one of extreme transition for the Hampton boys lacrosse team. A new coach in Randy Burns coupled with a jump to Division I is a lot to take on.

The Pine-Richland squad looked to add to the difficulty to the Talbots' situation when it hosted the new kids in the division.

Pine-Richland leaned on Hampton early and often, and as the game wound down, the Rams' defense tightened up.

Goals by Joe Briski, Brian Newcamp, Connor Slomka, Ryan Means and Chris Szelong helped the Rams build a 5-4 lead heading into the fourth quarter.

Nick Dudenas scored two goals, and Nick Grabowski and Jon Nigro added one each.

With time ticking away, it was time for Hampton to make a statement or fall victim to a young Rams squad.

Attacker Luke Happel knew just what to do … he got his stick on the ball, drew the attention of the Pine-Richland defense and dished to the arguably the best scorer the Talbots have: Andy DeMichiei.

The senior attacker cashed in with just more than three minutes to play and tied the score, 5-5.

The Rams were stunned but had one haymaker left to throw.

Moments after it appeared Happel and DeMichiei saved the day for Hampton, Newcamp scored his second goal of the game to give the lead and momentum back to Pine-Richland.

With both teams scrambling for possession and 1:23 left, Nigro bought Hampton some time with his second goal of the game.

The game went to sudden-death overtime, and with the next score deciding the game, what better time to net a milestone point?

DeMichiei found the back of the Pine-Richland net for the second time, earning the win and career point number 300.

“It was all coach (Sam) Happel,” DeMichiei said. “He drew up two really nice plays that got me open right in front of the net.”

Hampton won, 7-6, and gave itself some breathing room in the section.

“This is the kind of thing that can define a season,” Burns said. “They were patient and played with heart. We controlled the ball and played smart, and that is what it comes down to: making plays.”

DeMichiei said the team didn't get nervous despite trailing almost the entire second half.

“We didn't execute in the first half, but our defense and goalie played fantastic,” DeMichiei said.

Burns added that a win like this builds character and is important as the season takes shape.

Pine-Richland coach Jim Vollberg was disappointed in the loss but said his team still is learning to respect its own talent.

“If we play our game, we can beat anyone,” Vollberg said. “We played hard, but had some mental lapses.

“Hampton played a hell of a game. On that last play, we knew it was coming, we just didn't stop them. Hampton is pretty good.”

In addition to the win, DeMichiei reflected for a minute on the milestone point.

“It's a nice accomplishment. Now I am only about 130 behind the record (held by former Seneca Valley star Peet Poillion),” he said. “I just want to give a shout-out to my mom (tonight).”

Jerry Clark is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-779-6979 or jeclark@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.