Former Steelers wide receiver Ward honors local high school athletes
Twenty-eight high school athletes were honored at the second annual Western Pennsylvania Positive High School Athlete Awards on Saturday at the Senator John Heinz History Center.
The Positive Athlete Pittsburgh initiative, led by former Steelers wide receiver Hines Ward, was formed to promote the benefits of positivity to young athletes.
Ward addressed the room at the beginning of the event and talked about the benefits of finding the positive no matter how bad things get and maintaining an attitude that anything's possible. It's something too often missing, nowadays, said Ward, who mentioned the fate of his former team this year, saying the Steelers “didn't have enough guys in that locker room who were positive athletes.”
Ward also told the students that he wasn't always the best athlete, but teams need kids who can remain optimistic and humble, lead by example, put the team first and encourage others.
“We need more of you in our society today,” he said.
Ward, who is training for an Ironman triathlon, asked girls cross country winner Laura Kenderes, of South Side Beaver, for some running advice.
“One mile at a time,” was her reply.
Injured Pirates pitcher Jeff Karstens joined Ward on stage and posed for photographs with all the winners before presenting an award himself. He was also part of the event last year.
“It's kind of (an) award just to be asked to be part of it,” Karstens said. “I'm definitely honored.”
The committee received more than 500 nominations for students from 110 Western Pennsylvania high schools. Nominations came from coaches, principals, athletic directors, teachers and parents.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.