Share This Page

Pittsburgh Tribune-Review athletes of the week: Seneca Valley's Forrest Barnes, North Hills' Shannon Malone

| Wednesday, May 1, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Submitted
Seneca Valley track standout Forrest Barnes
Submitted
North Hills runner Shannon Malone.

Forrest Barnes

School: Seneca Valley

Class: Senior

Sport: Track and field

Claim to fame: A Citadel football recruit, Barnes won a gold medal in the 100 meters and 400-meter relay, and also took silver in the 200 meters at the Mars Invitational on Friday. Barnes, also a football standout, ran the 100 in 10.97, edging West Middlesex's Clay Allen and Raiders' teammate Jon Dorogy.

How do you feel you performed at the Mars Invitational?

I think it was the high point of my season so far. I'm just happy that the hard work paid off, and hopefully it leads to more in the future.

What are your expectations for the Baldwin Invitational on Friday?

I want to win the 100 and the 200. I won the 100 there last year. Also, I want to see how our relay team can do against heavy competition.

Has The Citadel given you any indication as to what your role will be as a freshman?

The only expectation they have for me basically is to be ready. No position is promised to anyone anywhere. I just have to go down this summer and work hard. They've stressed be ready to come in whenever they need you.

Would you feel comfortable if The Citadel decides to redshirt you?

Just like anybody, everybody wants to go out and play. If they redshirt me, they're just saying they want to develop me physically and mentally. I'm just going to go in and do the best that I can do.

Which major do you hope to pursue in college?

I'm going to study sports management and administration. When I get older, I want to become an athletic director or anything in the sports field. Sports is in my blood, and it's something I love.

Shannon Malone

School: North Hills

Class: Senior

Sport: Track and field

Claim to fame: Malone won the 1,600 and 3,200 at the Mars Invitational on Friday. Malone, who suffered a fractured foot during the cross country season, edged her younger sister, Mary, with times of 4:56.77 in the 1,600 and 10:52 in the 3,200 in her first invitational of the season.

Rate your performance at the Mars Invitational.

I thought it was good. It was one of the first races I've competed in since I came back. I was happy to get under five (minutes) and 11.

How were you able to recover from a fracture in your foot?

I did a lot of physical therapy and cross training with the swim team. That helped a lot. I also did a lot of biking and strength training.

Have you decided where you'll go to college?

I'm going to the University of Virginia. I'm really excited. I've been counting down the days.

Was it bittersweet having to beat your sister to take first in each race?

Yes. We work together, and I have to say she's been doing amazing this season. It's strange to race your sisters, but it helps you compete and get stronger.

Speaking of sisters, your sister Margo is at Syracuse. Is there a bit of a sibling rivalry between you three?

There's definitely a bit of a rivalry. We're all supportive and competitive. It's weird, but also nice knowing you're sisters are there with you. It makes us all better.

— Brian Graham

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.