Share This Page

High school baseball, softball rankings

| Saturday, May 11, 2013, 10:18 p.m.

Baseball

Class AAAA

Rank/Team W-L Prv.

1. Seneca Valley 16-3 1

2. Pine-Richland 15-4 2

3. North Allegheny 16-4 3

4. Hempfield 17-3 4

5. Central Catholic 16-4 5

Out: None

Class AAA

1. South Park 20-0 1

2. Hampton 17-2 3

3. Hopewell 17-3 2

4. West Allegheny 15-5 4

5. Chartiers Valley 16-4 5

Out: None

Class AA

1. Quaker Valley 18-0 1

2. Beaver 13-3 2

3. Riverside 15-3 3

4. Deer Lakes 15-3 4

5. Steel Valley 12-5 —

Out: Shady Side Acad. (12-6, 5)

Class A

1. OLSH 16-2 1

2. Serra Catholic 16-1 2

3. Riverview 14-2 3

4. Carmichaels 12-3 4

5. California 15-4 5

Out: None

softball

Class AAAA

Rank/Team W-L Prv.

1. Canon-McMillan 18-1 1

2. Latrobe 15-4 2

3. North Allegheny 15-4 3

4. Hempfield 15-5 4

5. McKeesport 16-4 5

Out: None

Class AAA

1. G'burg Salem 17-2 1

2. Ambridge 13-3 2

3. Eliz. Forward 16-4 3

4. West Mifflin 15-4 4

5. Trinity 11-4 5

Out: None

Class AA

1. Deer Lakes 16-0 1

2. Char.-Houston 16-0 2

3. Riverside 15-0 3

4. Seton-La Salle 12-1 4

5. Greensburg C.C. 10-4 —

Out: Burrell (14-4, 5)

Class A

1. Neshannock 14-2 1

2. Carmichaels 18-2 2

3. Frazier 16-2 3

4. Burgettstown 15-4 4

5. Sto-Rox 13-4 5

Out: None

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.