ShareThis Page

FR boys lacrosse fights to the end in playoff defeat

Doug Gulasy
| Wednesday, May 22, 2013, 9:21 a.m.
Franklin Regional midfielder Devin Arrigo throws a pass during the Panthers' WPIAL playoff game at Mt. Lebanon on May 16, 2013. The Panthers lost, 15-10.
Doug Gulasy | Murrysville Star
Franklin Regional midfielder Devin Arrigo throws a pass during the Panthers' WPIAL playoff game at Mt. Lebanon on May 16, 2013. The Panthers lost, 15-10.

The Franklin Regional boys lacrosse team's season ended last week, but not before the Panthers made a late charge against the top team in the WPIAL.

Trailing, 15-4, with five minutes remaining in a WPIAL playoff opener at Mt. Lebanon, Franklin Regional scored the final six goals of the game to end the season with a 15-10 defeat.

Despite the loss, coach Dave Alexander said he liked the way his team kept fighting against the top-seeded Blue Devils.

“We never gave up,” Alexander said. “They played a full 48 minutes, which is what I've been preaching all year. They gave me everything they had, really.”

Alexander said the effort his team showed continued a season-long trend.

The Panthers (8-9) finished the season with an overall losing record, but they had a 5-2 mark in WPIAL Division 1, Section 2.

That record included a 9-6 victory April 15 over section co-champion North Allegheny, which will play Mt. Lebanon in the WPIAL lacrosse championship game Thursday night. It was the Tigers' only section loss.

Alexander said his team also came within 10 seconds of beating the other section co-champ, Shady Side Academy, before the Indians scored to tie the score. Shady Side Academy won, 7-6, in overtime.

“To be able to make playoffs in our section, I'm very proud of that,” Alexander said. And if we're able to beat Shady Side, we're actually (the) No. 1 team in the section.

“That's how close being a No. 1 and a No. 4 in the playoffs comes down to.”

Franklin Regional will lose many contributors to this year's team, as a total of 11 seniors will graduate.

On the back end, the Panthers will lose all-region defender Luke Stephens and goalkeeper Luke Zottola. Connor Cummins, Nate Fleck and Michael Nejack will all return, giving the Panthers defensive strength next season.

Franklin Regional will lose attackers Willy Jackson, Shawn McDonnell, Kyle O'Rourke and Tanner Roberts, leaving space to fill on the front line. Alexander said he will look to junior varsity players to fill those positions.

Midfielder Devin Arrigo, whom Alexander called a “phenomenal athlete,” will return next year, as will attacker Justin Naugle.

Last week's loss marked Franklin Regional's third straight first-round exit from the postseason.

Alexander said the team would focus on transition work before next season after it became a strength for the Panthers in the second half of this season.

Additionally, Franklin Regional will focus on finishing games better. Of the Panthers' nine losses, four came by two goals or fewer — including three one-goal losses.

“It's just something we have to be able to be able to do, finish a game better next year,” Alexander said. “If we win those four or five games — and some of them weren't section games, but still — we turn an 8-8 regular season record with even just two or three of those wins into a 10-6 or 11-5 record. If you ask me, that's the type of record that I feel this team played up to this year.”

While the Panthers' end result was disappointing, Alexander said he enjoyed his first year as coach. The former junior varsity coach played for two Franklin Regional championship teams in the 1990s and hopes to lead his alma mater to another title soon.

“Even though we didn't win as many games as our goal was, I know that the players had a great time as well. (There was) a lot of teambuilding, a lot of team unity, a lot of togetherness. We had a great bunch of kids on the team.”

Doug Gulasy is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830 or via Twitter @dgulasy_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.