Shady Side Academy boys turn in solid lacrosse season
The Shady Side Academy boys lacrosse team saw its season come to an end in the WPIAL Division 1 semifinals last week as the Indians fell to North Allegheny by a 9-5 score, but the season was a successful one for the 11-5 Indians.
“We were 5-1 in Division 1, Section 2 and were co-champs of the section,” SSA coach Darrell Schmitt said.
The Indians also competed in the MSCLA (Middle States Collegiate Lacrosse Association) and finished with a 4-3 record and made the “B” bracket playoffs.
The leading scorers for the Indians this season were Dan Marous, Michael Concordia and Ian McCague.
The Indians had numerous players receive postseason recognition.
Marous made the MSCLA first team at midfield and Chris Bush was first-team defense. Concordia was chosen to the second team at midfield while Tucker Gillman, Matt O'Conner and Connor Jones received honorable mention.
Four SSA players were nominated for All-American — Bush, Marous, Concordia and Gillman, with Gillman making the squad. He was chosen as the 2013 WPCLA Player of the Year and was also an academic All-American, along with making the WPIAL all-section team.
Marous, Concordia and Bush also made the all-section team, along with Robert Woodings.
Bush and McCague are seniors. Other seniors on the team are Dylan Wecht, Jake Farrell, captain Peter Eisenbrandt, Michael Mathieson, Alex Young, Clayton Hirsch and Will Bensur.
“The key to the team's success was our defense and our strength in goal,” Schmitt said. “We gave up the fewest goals in the WPIAL.”
Schmitt was also proud of the effort put in by this season's group of seniors.
“They did a tremendous job and they will be greatly missed next year,” he said.
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.