Shady Side Academy girls have lacrosse success
Despite its season-ending loss in the first round of the PIAA playoffs two weeks ago, Shady Side Academy girls lacrosse coach Emily Schaknowski was very pleased with the team's overall performance.
“We had a very successful and exciting season this year,” she said. “I had a great group of intelligent, hard-working and unselfish players.
“This year, we achieved one step more toward the WPIAL championship.
“We made it to the championship game and lost to a very talented Peters Township team.”
Schaknowski said the team's success is especially satisfying considering that Shady Side Academy's attendance numbers are much smaller than that of many of the schools the team competes against.
“We are competing against schools that are sometimes as much as five times larger than SSA,” she said.
The highlights of the season, Schaknowski said, were an overtime win against Mt. Lebanon and a victory over Peters Township in the second half of the season.
Schaknowski knows that she will have to replace some key players for next year.
“I had four extremely talented senior that are graduating this year,” she said. “Felicia Tissenbaum, K.K. Jaffe, Mickey Saperstein and Lia Winter have all been great leaders and teammates during the two years that I have been the coach.
“Our roster is wide open for next year and every girl playing lacrosse here will be a key player for our program.”
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.