New coach helping guide GCC cross country runners
It's easy for Greensburg Central Catholic cross country coach Tori Vallana to understand where her runners are coming from.
It was only a few years ago she was in their shoes.
Vallana, 20, is in her first season coaching the Centurions. The Seton Hill student majoring in dietetics was an assistant track coach in the fall before being offered the cross country job. Despite the rigors of being a college student, she knew she had to accept.
“Coaching is something I always wanted to do and when the opportunity came up, I had to take it,” she said.
Vallana said her youth is an advantage in that she understands her runners better because of their age.
“It can be hard sometimes, but I think it makes me more relatable for them,” she said. “I went through what they are going through recently.
“It does give me an advantage. I may not be that experienced at coaching, but I know their mindset and what they want to get out of it. I think I understand where they are coming from more. A lot of coaches only see it at one angle.”
The runners understand that Vallana is in control even though she is young enough to be a peer.
“I'm pretty relaxed with them, but they know when to listen to me and know I'm in charge,” she said.
So far, Vallana has been exactly the coach her runners need.
“She understands we have homework and stuff,” junior Cassie Sauter said.
This marks Sauter's first year on the cross country squad, and the results have been impressive. She won the Centurions Section 4-AA race against Kittanning with a time of 20 minutes, 42 seconds. She took third place at the California (Pa.) University Invitational (21:44) and 21st at the Red, White and Blue Invitational (20:44).
Ed Phillipps is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.