Hard work, senior leadership lead SSA cross country team to strong start
The Shady Side Academy girls cross country team has gotten off to a fast start.
It finished 12th out of 26 teams at the Red, White and Blue Invitational on Sept. 7 and has posted wins against Southmoreland, Ford City and Kittanning.
The lone loss so far was to Freeport.
“We have a hard-working team,” SSA coach Sue Whitney said. “We also have a great group of seniors who provide outstanding leadership. There has been a renewed interest in the program.
“We have 29 girls on the team this year, and a lot of them are seniors who came out for the team for the first time.”
The team has been led by a quintet of returning seniors — Rebkah Tesfamariam, Sarah Deiseroth, Mackenzie Klinvex, Leah Stauber and Kathryn Olon.
“Rebkah was instrumental in getting our numbers up,” Whitney said. “She got a lot of her friends to come out for the team, and they're experiencing how much fun it is.”
Juniors Elizabeth Ejzak, Angie Kim, Aine Marie Policastro and Michelle Wolf along with sophomores Sydney Jones and Emily Natoli and freshman Lindsey Stauber also have contributed to the team's success.
“This is the most enthusiastic, hard-working team I've had,” Whitney said. “They also have great camaraderie and are very supportive of each other.
“The seniors came into this season with one major goal in mind, and that is to qualify for the WPIAL team playoffs. They're doing a great job of motivating the rest of the team. We haven't qualified as a team since 2009, and the girls are working hard to make it back.”
“It's been a lot of fun, and the winning makes it even more pleasant.
“I have high hopes for this team. They're doing everything it takes to have a successful season.”
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.