Share This Page

Greensburg Trib athletes of the week: Kiski Area's Dutch Shaffer, Penn-Trafford's Royse Bachtel

| Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Submitted
Penn-Trafford's Royse Bachtel
Submitted

Dutch Shaffer

School: Kiski Area

Class: Senior

Sport: Soccer

Claim to fame: Shaffer, who has been battling ankle injuries all season, scored twice, including the winning goal with seven minutes remaining, to lead Kiski Area (8-4, 6-2) to a 2-1 win over Penn-Trafford in Section 1-AAA on Sept. 24. Shaffer, who has five goals this season, scored twice against Gateway on Sept. 10.

What are your college plans for next year?

I plan to go to Penn State Behrend and major in plastics engineering. I haven't fully committed to playing soccer or to Penn State Behrend in particular. I really enjoy cars. I wanted to help design them. It's a hard field to getting into. It interests me quite a bit.

Royse Bachtel

School: Penn-Trafford

Class: Senior

Sport: Golf

Claim to fame: Bachtel, who has helped lead Penn-Trafford to a Section 3-AA title for the fourth year in a row, finished tied for fourth place as she shot 83 in the Section 3-AAA tournament at Vandergrift Golf Club in early September. Bachtel finished in 12th place at the WPIAL Class AAA Championship at Hill Crest Country Club on Monday.

What are your college plans for next year?

Nothing is set yet. I have been looking at Baldwin-Wallace, Allegheny and Mt. Union. I definitely want to play golf in college and major in either political science or English.

Who do you think is the best on your team?

I think we all have areas that we have perfected. Casey Doran, Rachel Huber and I have gotten our consistency together. We can deliver with a big shot when we need it. We all understand our roles on the team.

— Andrew John

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.