Share This Page

Baldwin girls' team logs win at Central Catholic Invitational

| Wednesday, Oct. 9, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

The Baldwin girls' cross country team has been developing a solid starting lineup during the 2013 season.

The finishing time between the Lady Highlanders' first and fifth runners at the Central Catholic Invitational last Saturday was less than 16.2 seconds.

Little wonder that the local runners took first place in the varsity girls B division at the annual competition at the Schenley Oval.

Senior Alicia Mastroianni is the team's No. 1 runner, and she led the way at the Central Catholic invite with a 21-minute, 21.8-second time and a ninth-place overall showing.

The next four Baldwin finishers — junior Stephanie Bott, sophomore Alex Barr, freshman Abby Barr and sophomore Dighan Kelly — placed 11th, 13th, 14 and 15th, respectively, with times of 21:26.2, 21:30.5, 21:34.3 and 21:38.

Sophomores Erica Koenig (21:56.3) and Daria Och (22:48.2) were next in line for the Lady Highlanders, ending up 19th and 27th, and were flanked by Mackenzie Nolan, a sophomore, and Stephanie Swift, a junior.

The Baldwin girls wrapped up the varsity B division team championship with a 62-point total, comfortably ahead of runner-up Freeport's 75-point performance.

Knoch, with 80 points, Bishop Canevin, with 121, and Beaver, with 126, rounded out the top five.

Taylor paces Highlanders' squad

Baldwin corralled 10th place in the varsity boys A division at the Central Catholic Invitational.

The Highlanders were led by sophomore Kevin Taylor, who posted a time of 17:18.5 and placed 18th overall.

Taylor set the pace for teammates Dennis Doyle (17:49.4), Mark Demore (18:00.5) and Sean McLaughlin (18:42.5), all juniors, and sophomore Alex Murray (18:47.6).

Ray Fisher is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at 412-388-5820 or rfisher@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.