VND high school roundup: Leechburg tops Brentwood in WPIAL playoffs
Leechburg was one of the last teams in the WPIAL volleyball playoffs, but the Blue Devils will be sticking around for a second match.
Kassidi Horrell had a match-high 11 kills and three aces, and Natalie Geminetti added seven kills to lead Leechburg to a 3-0 win over Brentwood in a Class A preliminary round match Tuesday at Fox Chapel.
Marissa George had a balanced game with five kills, four blocks and three aces, and Tessa Verner added four aces for Leechburg, which won by game scores of 25-21, 25-7 and 25-21. The Blue Devils (7-7) advance to face No. 3 Our Lady of the Sacred Heart in a first-round match Thursday.
“It feels great because we haven't been in the playoffs since my freshman year,” Horrell said. “We had a lot of fun on the court tonight.”
After pulling out a tight first set, Leechburg raced out to a 15-2 lead in the second game on eight service points by Verner and six by George. The Blue Devils sealed the match in the third set by scoring nine of the final 12 points to rally from an 18-16 deficit.
Even when trailing during the third set, Leechburg played a confident attacking game, which stemmed partly from facing a familiar opponent.
“When we heard that we were playing Brentwood, the girls were happy because we had played them before,” Leechburg coach Samantha Baker said. “We played them at Kiski (Area's tournament) and took two sets from them. We warned them to be ready for anything, but our girls were confident that they could win this.”
The win is only the second postseason victory for Leechburg since 2005, when the Blue Devils advanced to the WPIAL quarterfinals.
If this year's team is to match that feat, it will need to upset No. 3 seed Our Lady of the Sacred Heart. But coming from Section 1-A, which produced two of Class A's top six seeds — Greensburg Central Catholic and West Shamokin — the Blue Devils believe they are prepared to face another top team.
“We kept up with West Shamokin, so we're ready for anybody,” Horrell said. “We look at it like, ‘Who cares what the other team's record is?' If we come out and play our hardest and play our best, we'll have a chance, and hopefully we can win.”
Kittanning 3, Ambridge 0
Kirsten Wolfe hit 10 kills, Casey Harkleroad had nine kills and four blocks, and Terra Schall added seven kills for Kittanning (11-3), which won the WPIAL Class AA preliminary-round match at Fox Chapel by game scores of 25-6, 25-12 and 25-15. For Ambridge (6-7), Nicole Kuhn had five of the team's 18 kills.
The prelim, Kittanning's fifth in as many years, lasted less than an hour — the Wildcats won each of those five preliminary-round games.
“We usually play this well, and playing against a lot of top teams in the (Norwin) tournament last weekend helped us get a lot of energy out there,” Wolfe said. “Now we just need to get ready for the next game. We're not going to let up at all.”
Kittanning will play No. 3 Thomas Jefferson at 7:30 p.m, Thursday at Thomas Jefferson.
Springdale 3, Jefferson-Morgan 1
Megan Cavanaugh served 16 points for Springdale (10-6) in the WPIAL Class A preliminary-round win over Jefferson-Morgan. The Dynamos, in the playoffs for the first time since 1998, won the match by game scores of 25-13, 25-17 and 25-16. Jefferson-Morgan claimed Game 3, 25-21.
“Their hearts were in it, their serves were in it,” Springdale coach Amy Sigmund said. “They were getting all their passes off. It was everything that we practiced. They wanted it tonight.”
Springdale will play No. 1 seed Bishop Canevin at 7:30 p.m. Thursday at Bishop Canevin.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.