Shady Side Academy earns 3rd straight field hockey title
Photo by Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Shady Side Academy field hockey juggernaut rolls on.
The Indians defeated Winchester Thurston (14-3) in overtime 2-1 on Oct. 29 to claim their third straight WPIAL Class AA title.
It was the Indians' 13th WPIAL championship.
Sophomore midfielder Corby Wolfe, who entered the game two minutes earlier, scored the winner with one minute left in overtime. She got an assist from Sarah Anania, who scored SSA's earlier goal to tie the game in the second half. An assist went to Lucy Buckman.
Wolfe was put into the game at forward, a position she had never played before.
“Corby is an aggressive player who hustles,” SSA coach Erin Weir said. “Our forwards needed a break, and she had fresh legs so I thought I would try her. I'm glad I did.”
Weir said she is proud of the team's effort.
“They had to work hard to make it this far,” Weir said. “We have come a long way from the beginning of the season, and I loved watching their excitement. It continued the entire bus ride home.”
Weir said the Indians focused to much on defense early, but fought hard and battled back after falling behind.
“Thankfully the girls were able to turn that around,” Weir said. “I thought Winchester was fantastic.
“I knew the girls would feel confident going into the overtime, but I wasn't convinced there would be an overtime until the buzzer sounded. Winchester was so strong the entire game that I thought they could score up to the last second.
“Since we just played a double-OT (game) with Ellis, I knew that the girls could be strong in OT and I knew they were comfortable with overtime play.”
The Indians were scheduled to begin PIAA play Nov. 5. Results of that game were not available at press time.
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.