Alle-Kiski high school notebook: Rule mix-up cost Kiski Area boys soccer playoff victory
Incorrect shootout rules applied by game referees cost Kiski Area's boys soccer team a WPIAL Class AAA first-round win over Bethel Park.
Rather than follow a sudden-victory format after the Cavaliers and Black Hawks remained tied through five shooters, the referees held another five-shooter round and determined the winner by the cumulative score.
Bethel Park won the shootout 6-5 on Oct. 21 and made its way to the WPIAL semifinals.
Cavaliers coach Bob Wright knew pro-level shootouts followed sudden-victory rules — after the initial five shooters, each goal must be matched by the opponent's shooter, or the game ends.
But he trusted the referees knew the high school rules better than him, so he didn't object to the officials' request.
After speaking with coaches and reviewing the rule book the next day, Wright realized the referees ran the shootout wrong.
Kiski Area, which got a goal and then stopped Bethel Park's shooter, should've won the sudden-victory portion.
“I was not prepared to proceed with any kind of argument and didn't have any support or basis beyond my own understanding,” said Wright, who had never witnessed a high school game go past the initial five-shooter phase. “I simply assumed this was one rule that had been altered slightly for the purpose of high schools, and that the referees were aware of it.”
Wright informed Kiski Area athletic director Ryan Berberich, who brought the mistake to the attention of WPIAL and PIAA officials. Wright and Berberich received little feedback; the crux of the response, Wright said, was that a referee's decision is final.
The coach has encouraged his team to move on, rather than obsess over something that can't be reversed.
“I guess I resolved it in the sense that I can't argue that it was an unfair procedure that was applied,” Wright said. “If that (10-shooter format) happened to be the procedure, it was as fair as any.”
Knoch senior drawing offers
Knoch senior Connor Shinsky plans to endure more than a few long car rides during the next couple of months.
Until the two-way standout lineman investigates several college campuses in person, he said he's unlikely to commit himself to a school's football program.
The 6-foot-5, 255-pound Shinsky has scholarship offers from five FBS or FCS schools — Bucknell, Kent State, Lafayette, UTEP and St. Francis. He's also fielding heavy interest from Akron, Bowling Green and Massachusetts.
Shinsky visited Lafayette on Sept. 14 to see the Leopards play William & Mary, and he saw Kent State's campus during a workout this spring. The rest of the possible destinations remain unexplored.
He expects his college visit schedule to stretch into January.
“I kind of wanted to focus on the team during the season and let it play out a little bit,” Shinsky said. “Now that the season is over, I can focus on more extensive research, planning visits and stuff like that.”
Lafayette wants Shinsky as a defensive tackle, while the rest are recruiting him for offensive tackle. Shinsky said he has no position preference.
Nolf is No. 1
At one showcase after another this offseason, Kittanning senior Jason Nolf proved himself against the nation's best.
Nolf's reward? A No. 1 ranking in his weight class by multiple national wrestling websites.
Amateur Wrestling News and Flowrestling list Nolf, a Penn State recruit, as the country's best 138-pounder. He cemented his reputation this fall by winning the Super 32 Challenge in Greensboro, N.C., on Oct. 27 and then defeating Blair Academy (N.J.) standout Joey McKenna, 10-5, in the Who's #1 dual meet at Lehigh on Nov. 2.
Nolf, who won each of his seven Super 32 matches by at least seven points and had three pins, had 128 wrestlers in his weight class.
In the Who's #1 event, Nolf beat McKenna, who won a National Prep title last season and claimed a Junior national championship in Fargo, N.D., this summer.
Nolf enters his senior season with two PIAA titles, three WPIAL titles and a career record of 132-1.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.