Share This Page

Leader Times roundup: West Shamokin topples rival Kittanning in boys basketball

| Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2014, 11:06 p.m.

Call West Shamokin the king of the Armstrong School District.

Jake Hough and Scott Przybysz each scored 14 points for the Wolves in a nonsection win over visiting Kittanning, 48-36.

The win completes a season sweep for West Shamokin over their Armstrong School District rival as it also took both meetings with Ford City.

Zane Clowser added 13 points, and Hough grabbed 11 rebounds for West Shamokin (15-3).

Noah Kunst contributed 10 points, and Alek Shaffer added eight to lead Kittanning (7-12).

Leechburg 39, Trinity Christian 29 Ben Ritchie scored 17 points as Leechburg knocked off visiting Trinity Christian in Section 4-A play. The win avenged a one-point loss from their previous meeting.

Alex Sipolino chipped in seven points for Leechburg (8-11, 2-7).

Jonathan Murphy scored eight points for Trinity Christian (8-12, 3-6).

Indiana 65, Freeport 51 Riley Stapleton converted three of Indiana's seven 3-pointers, and tied Kevin Jack with a team-high 17 points during the Section 1-AAA win for the Indians (18-2, 9-2).

Josh Beale sank four 3-pointers as he scored a game-high 25 points to pace Freeport (8-11, 2-9).

Girls basketball

Apollo-Ridge 47, Riverview34 Julia DeMeno scored 15 points, and Megan Bonelli added 11 to lead the playoff-bound Vikings (12-7) to a nonsection win at home.

Bree Patsey and Sadie Buscher each scored 13 to lead Riverview (12-8).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.