Sewickley Academy girls lacrosse in rebuilding mode
Sewickley Academy's Maggie McClain defends against Franklin Regional's Ellen Gray during a game on Thursday, May 1, 2014, at Nichols Field in Edgeworth.
Photo by Kristina Serafini | Sewickley Herald
Rebuilding, the Sewickley Academy girls lacrosse team (3-9-1 overall and 3-6-1 in Division I, Section 2) expects to miss the playoffs for the first time since joining the WPIAL in 2005.
Of 19 players, only three are seniors.
“We are young (in) both experience and age,” longtime coach Cheryl Ann Lassen said.
“This is the first year for me to be on a rebuilding team,” senior co-captain and fourth-year player Olivia Ragoowansi said.
Senior midfielder Maggie McClain leads the Panthers with 48 goals and eight assists.
Junior midfielder Kayla Guerin (32 goals and nine assists) trails.
Junior Jackie Bushee has a 45 percent save average as goalie.
“The team is really improving,” said junior defender Ellen Clouse, noting the Panthers need to spread out more and communicate better. “We know what we have to work on.”
Clouse enjoys building for the future.
“I'm excited,” she said. “We have (many) freshmen.
“Even after I graduate, I'm looking forward to seeing how the team will do.”
Sophomore Erin Sebastian likes she has gained experience as a goalie and an attack.
Lassen shares her players' optimism.
“We have been developing as a team (and) learning how to be confident,” she said.
Sewickley Academy, the WPIAL runner-up in 2011, lost in the first round of the Division I playoffs to eventual champion Peters Township, 20-8, last year.
The Panthers have posted wins over Seneca Valley, North Allegheny and Franklin Regional. They lost to Friends' Central, Mt. Lebanon, Franklin Regional, Pine-Richland (2), Shady Side Academy, Seneca Valley, Quaker Valley and Fox Chapel. They also tied Fox Chapel, 11-11, last week.
Karen Kadilak is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.