Prospect watch: Grambling-bound Justin Dobbs
6-foot-3, 185 pounds, G, Allderdice
Justin Dobbs has never been one to panic, but the former Allderdice star was starting to wonder whether he would get the opportunity to play Division I basketball.
Duquesne was recruiting him until coach Ron Everhart was fired. After he was hired at Youngstown State, former Dukes assistant Steve Hall continued pursuing Dobbs, but the Penguins had no scholarships to offer.
So Hall sent a tape to his friend, Joseph Price, who was hired in May at Grambling and was scrambling to find a point guard. When Price popped in that tape, he found his man. Sort of.
Dobbs never played point guard at Allderdice, where he scored 1,184 points to lead the Dragons to three consecutive City League championships. He had some experience at the position while playing for the Young Gunz AAU team.
“I have to become a point guard now,” Dobbs said. “It'll be interesting. I can adjust. I'm pretty versatile. It's just, in my high school career, my team needed me to score points. That's what (Price) said, that he's not going to change my game. He doesn't have a problem with the point guard scoring the ball. They said they were going to be patient with me and nurture me.”
Dobbs was debating between going to Division II Clarion or a prep school, but now he will get a chance to play in the Southwestern Athletic Conference. The Tigers were 4-24 last season, struggling amid the penalty phase for falling short of NCAA APR standards.
Dobbs won't be counted on to score too much, considering Grambling returns Quincy Roberts of Harrisburg, a St. John's transfer who averaged 23.9 points in 20 games last season.
“They stumbled last year, but I was never one to back away from a challenge,” Dobbs said. “I want to try to help turn it around.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.