New coach hopes history repeats itself at Penn Hills
The 75th season of Penn Hills football could be a memorable one.
The Indians not only will try to extend their streak of 14 straight years in the WPIAL playoffs, but the school district is ready to unveil a renovated Yuhas-McGinley Field that includes artificial turf.
A ceremony is planned surrounding the Sept. 13 home game against Baldwin that will be televised by ROOT Sports as part of that station's Thursday night football series.
Penn Hills also has a new coach this season as John Peterman, who also serves as the school district's athletic director, takes over the position.
“With the history we have here, we want to uphold the tradition,” said Peterman, a 1985 Penn Hills graduate.
”When I was a senior, we were ranked No. 1 in the state until we were upset in the playoffs. I remember growing up and watching Tommy Flynn and Bill Fralic play.”
Penn Hills started play as Penn Township High School in 1937 and was winless in seven games.
But since then, the Indians have compiled a .630 winning percentage and have made 30 WPIAL playoff appearances.
Penn Hills is also a common stop for major college recruiters looking for players, and this year is no different. In fact, the school had a combine for players, and college coaches were provided video of the event.
“Our job is to open the door; it's the players who have to walk through it,” Peterman said.
Aaron Bailey returns at running back and Darius Holloway, who was injured in the second scrimmage last year, is set at quarterback.
Receiver Jordan Davenport, who caught only 12 passes last year, will have an expanded role.
The line will be anchored by Lynwood Barron, at 6-foot-4 and 315 pounds.
Athletes such as senior Toreek Hester and junior Marshall Thompson are also on the radar screens of college scouts.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.