Travel schedule a challenge for Plum this season
The Plum varsity football team will take the roads less traveled this season, as conference realignment introduces the Mustangs to some unfamiliar conference faces.
Woodland Hills and Penn Hills remain on the conference schedule, but Plum also will face new league foes Baldwin, Bethel Park, Mt. Lebanon, Peters Township, Canon-McMillan and Upper St. Clair.
The Mustangs will make trips through potentially heavy Friday afternoon and evening traffic and construction areas on Route 376 to Baldwin, Mt. Lebanon, Canon-McMillan and Upper St. Clair.
“There's not a lot we can do about it,” Plum coach Frank Sacco said. “Traveling will be difficult, not only for us, but for the band, the cheerleaders and the fans. But all the teams in the conference are in the same situation, so we have to make the best of it.”
Sacco knows what his team is up against this season.
“There are no slouches in this conference,” Sacco said. “It's going to be a grinder.”
Plum struggled to a 1-8 overall record in 2011 and was 0-6 in Quad East play.
But Sacco said this year's team, which features 25 returning letterwinners, has the right attitude to start turning things around.
Sacco said while there is experience on both sides of the ball, both units still will be young. Injuries to key players and the inexperience of younger replacements, Sacco said, contributed to the inability to win on Friday nights.
“The key for us again this year is staying healthy,” Sacco said.
Senior Jake DiGuilio is Plum's lone returning all-conference player from a year ago. He earned a second-team nod at linebacker.
DiGuilio, who enters his third year as a two-way starter and has gained interest from Division III schools, led the Mustangs in tackles last year with 53.
On offense, he scored four of Plum's five rushing touchdowns in 2011.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.