Coughlin ready to take reigns for Upper St. Clair again
Upper St. Clair is confident it can replace Dakota Conwell at quarterback, thanks to Pete Coughlin's smashing starting debut.
The Panthers turned to Coughlin after losing Conwell, an Arizona recruit who accounted for 2,000 yards total offense, to a high ankle sprain last postseason.
Coughlin responded by rushing for 209 yards, including a 73-yard touchdown, and throwing for 61 yards and another score in a stunning WPIAL semifinal victory over nationally ranked Central Catholic last fall.
“We knew what we had,” USC coach Jim Render said. “I'm not saying I knew he was going to gain 200-some yards against Central Catholic, the 10th-ranked team in the country. I couldn't say I knew that, but we weren't totally surprised out of our minds that he did that.”
Coughlin also relieved Conwell against North Allegheny in the WPIAL championship loss, completing 7 of 12 passes for 146 yards, including a 65-yard touchdown, and rushing for 63 yards on 23 carries.
“I thought I could do well, but that (Central) performance wasn't something I expected,” he said. “It's nice to get that recognition, but I still have to prove I can keep it up the whole season, not just one or two games.”
Upper St. Clair is counting on the 5-foot-10, 165-pound senior to be its offensive catalyst this season.
“It's a little different, but I think I can show I can do it,” Coughlin said. “I'm not too worried about failing because they have so much confidence in me.”
Render said the Panthers were in the process of implementing a package of plays with Conwell and Coughlin in the same backfield to take advantage of Coughlin's quickness and elusiveness.
“That's what makes him dangerous,” Render said.
“He is just so quick, and he can break the other guy's ankles. We need to run our base stuff and be creative with what we do with him.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.