Gateway has weapons to contend for WPIAL title
Gateway coach Terry Smith's future is uncertain beyond the 2012 season.
The district's school board reduced his athletic director position to part time and eliminated Smith's coaching privileges if he remains a school administrator.
What Smith is certain of, however, is this year's Gateway team — possibly his last — has the talent to make a run for a WPIAL title.
“We've worked hard,” Smith said. “We worked out four days a week this summer and had close to 90 percent attendance each time. They're dedicated and committed and are doing everything we've asked them to do. The goals are there for them.”
Gateway finished 9-3 last year, losing in the WPIAL semifinals. The Gators also will attempt to get the conference title back after finishing second to McKeesport two years ago and runner-up to Penn-Trafford last season.
The offense is experienced, as nine starters return. Six of them will be three-year starters, and six earned all-conference honors in 2011.
Senior quarterback Thomas Woodson, an Arizona recruit, is back to lead the offense, and will have Pitt recruit Jaymar Parrish, a tight end, as a top target.
Other starters back include seniors Darin Franklin (running back), Mileak Ford (tight end), Andre Martin (running back), Anthony Parente (tackle) and R.J. Hughes (tackle) and juniors Joe Robak (center) and Delvon Randall (wide receiver).
The Gators' defense returns six starters, including three along the line in Hughes, Parente and senior Brandon Madjerich.
Parrish will anchor the linebacking corps, and Randall and junior Anthony Davis return as starters to pace what Smith feels is an experienced group in the secondary, which also features junior Montae Nicholson and senior Todd Jeter at safety and senior Tale Brisker at cornerback.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.