Latrobe offense not afraid of adjustments
Latrobe coach Ray Reitz doesn't mind tweaking his offense.
He tries to mold his game plan around the talent that he has.
Reitz runs a version of the wing-T, and he brought in a coach from New York to show the players different ways to succeed.
“You're always looking for new things,” Reitz said after his team finished 5-4 in 2011 and 2-4 in the Quad South Conference. “He showed us a version of the wing-T from the shotgun.”
This year, the offense will revolve around junior quarterback Logan Carns, a good athlete and leader, according to Reitz.
Cairns will be asked to play a bigger role in the offense this season.
And while the team graduated talented running backs Scott Mohring, Derrick Zavatsky and Richie Hall, Reitz feels Robert Vasinko, Lucas Weltz, Isaiah Jones, Dylan Kovatch and Luke Monteparte are capable replacements. Vasinko was the team's leading rusher last season.
“A lot of sophomores will get a chance to play,” Reitz said. “We're going to be young in spots, but the plan is to rotate a lot of players on the offensive and defensive lines and in the backfield. We want to keep players fresh.
“We probably will use five or six running backs during a game, and we'll have depth along the lines. A lot will depend on how fast the line gels.”
Despite the key losses, which also include tackle Dylan Colucci (now at Youngstown State), Reitz said a lot of underclassmen got playing time last fall. Among the returning starters are tackle Jake Pawlowski, tackle Anthony Delellis and center Chris Brant.
Other players who saw a lot of playing time on both sides of the ball were Alec Hoopes, Josh Shivetts and Brandon Friedline.
“We have some players who can be pretty good,” Reitz said. “It's always nice to have senior leadership, and we're looking for a couple seniors to step up and assume the role.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.