Ringgold hopes to maintain consistency despite graduation losses
During his first two years as the coach at Ringgold, Matt Humbert has led the Rams to a combined 17-4 record, including a 13-1 mark in conference play.
Considering the program's losses to graduation, including several key players from last year's team that advanced to the WPIAL quarterfinals, it would be safe to assume that Humbert and his staff are in a rebuilding mode.
But that couldn't be farther from the truth.
“The nice thing is we have 22 seniors and that is a good luxury to have coming back,” Humbert said. “We lost talent, but we have a lot back.”
Leading the returning group will be a pair of skilled seniors — running back Demetrius Louis and jack-of-all-trades athlete Joey Wall.
“They are two of the best athletes in the conference,” Humbert said. “Demetrius is a Division I athlete, and Joey will play all over the field.”
Humbert said the line will be solid and strong on both sides of the ball, with the offensive line protecting the two quarterbacks who will step in for graduate Quad Law, who led the team in passing and rushing in 2011.
Senior Chris Spahr saw time last year, and Quad's younger brother, sophomore Niko Law, is also in the running.
“We have two quarterbacks, and I can't deem a starter,” Humbert said. “We are lucky to have two and both will see time. They both have great qualities that offset each other.”
The Rams will play in the Big 9 Conference this year, which is a combination of the former Keystone and Big Eight conferences.
“I view us as one of the top three teams in the conference, and we have a lot of kids that have bought in and sold out,” Humbert said.
“Our numbers during the summer haven't dipped below 50. We may have lost a few key guys and some role players who were leaders last year, but it is just a matter of what kids will fit into which positions.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.