Recovered from injury, QB ready to shoulder load for Blackhawk
Chandler Kincade's throwing shoulder hasn't been the same since he injured it last September.
Actually, he says that's a good thing.
“It's better than it has ever been, honestly,” said the Blackhawk quarterback who spent months rehabbing his dislocated shoulder. “If I had to tell you the percentage, it would be 110 because it's never really felt this good.”
Now, the 6-foot-4 junior wants to prove that to everybody. The Pitt recruit has been throwing since early May, eager for his chance to make up for lost time.
“I know there's a lot of questioning about how well I'll come back,” he said. “I'm ready to prove myself. I feel more confident in my shoulder and arm than before.”
With Kincade again healthy and a solid core returning, Blackhawk should be a favorite to make the playoffs. The Cougars fell one win short a year ago and haven't reached the WPIAL playoffs since 2009, when they lost in the Class AAA championship game to Thomas Jefferson.
“I expect us to be a pretty good team if we can all play on the same page,” Kincade said. “I expect us to be a playoff team for sure and be a contender for the championship.”
Kincade has at least three solid targets, including senior wideout Alex Caratelli (6-1), the leading receiver in 2011. Senior Joe Campbell (6-0) and junior Andy Podbielski (6-4, 235) return at tight end.
Just don't expect the Cougars to abandon the run.
Blackhawk has senior tailback Cole Chiappialle, one of three rushers with more than 400 yards last season. The other two graduated, leaving Chiappialle as lead back. He'll run behind Tyler Beatrice, Tom Graham and Nolan Moffett, returning starters who will solidify the interior line.
“I'm OK if we hand the ball off 30 times and throw it three,” Kincade said, “or vice versa, as long as we're winning.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.