Franklin Regional using semifinal loss as motivation
Franklin Regional came within seconds of playing for a WPIAL Class AAA football title in 2011.
A long pass, a controversial non-fumble call and a last-second field goal helped Knoch defeat Franklin Regional, 9-7, in a semifinal-round game at Valley High School.
Franklin Regional players felt they had recovered a fumble before the game-winning field goal. It was the one that got away.
That loss was tough to take for Franklin Regional players, especially the ones returning this season.
And for added incentive for this season, Franklin Regional coach Greg Botta has a photo of the scoreboard hanging in the locker room to remind them of the score.
“Sure it's a motivator,” Botta said. “One of the goals is to play at Heinz Field, and we want the players to remember the feeling after that loss.”
Franklin Regional is well stocked for that run.
Heading the list of returnees are running back Dane Brown, quarterback Nico Lodovico, middle linebacker Carter Henderson, tight end Adam Mihoci, wide receiver Charan Singh and linemen Luke Fleck, Sean Miller and Joey McGuire.
Botta had to replace members of the defensive secondary, wide receiver corps and a couple inside linebackers. There also are five new assistant coaches that Botta hired.
“I'm concerned about the transition and how they work with the players,” Botta said. “We have to get the players to believe in the new coaches.”
One change Botta is thrilled about is the new conference.
Gone are the Keystone Conference trips to Fayette County to play Albert Gallatin, Uniontown and Laurel Highlands. It's back to the Greater Allegheny Conference. The Panthers, along with Greensburg Salem, Derry and Hollidaysburg, join Highlands, Indiana, Mars, Knoch and Hampton from the Greater Allegheny.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.