Shady Side Academy left to replace leading skill players from championship team
Shady Side Academy will be looking to claim its fourth Allegheny Conference championship in five years this season but will have some gaping holes to fill, including spaces left by the Indians' leading passer, rusher and receiver.
“We lost our leading rusher and passer in Reggie Mitchell, and we've got to find replacements for Andrew Geisler, Jake Ellis and Ryan Reynolds,” coach Dave Havern said. “Reggie started 28 games for us, Andrew started 41, and Jake and Ryan started 26 each. That's a lot of experience that we lost. Those four guys had fine careers at SSA and helped us win a lot of games. We have to replace their considerable playing ability and have some people step up to replace the leadership. That's one of our big questions.”
Mitchell played offense and defense and is now at Wisconsin, while Geisler was twice an all-conference center and Ellis also played two ways and made the all-conference team twice.
Senior Matt Granato will be taking over at quarterback.
“He got a chance to play last year when Reggie was injured, and he did fine,” Havern said. “It's tough to replace an athlete like Reggie, but we're not worried about the QB position. Matt has shown that he can get the job done.”
Despite the key losses, the Indians will return 14 starters. Included among them are outstanding junior running backs Jared Brevard and Dennis Briggs, who each topped 700 yards last year.
“I've said it before,” Havern said. “I think that we have the best pair of running backs in WPIAL Class AA. Having running backs like that will take a lot of the pressure off of Matt.”
Other seniors returning are wide receiver Chad Wallace, lineman Jake Farrell, lineman-linebacker Josh Loper, lineman Joe Bray, tight end-linebacker Chris Bush and tight end-linebacker Aaron Horne.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.