Share This Page

Beaver's matured offense could make quick impact

| Thursday, Aug. 23, 2012, 6:22 p.m.
Christopher Horner
Beaver quarterback Alex Rowse. Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review

It took one season for Jeff Beltz's defensive system to sink in, and when it did, it clicked.

“We've taken an approach that we want our athletes to play fast,” Beltz said. “The less thinking they do, the better off they are.”

Last season, the Bobcats leaned on a blitz defense and only allowed 54 points in the regular season.

But defense wasn't the only focus last year. Beltz hopes that a new offense, which he began implementing last year, will be ready to make an impact.

“We modernized the systems in that we've designed a system that our kids really enjoy,” he said. “The offense was a year behind the defense.”

The Bobcats, who ended last season with a WPIAL Class AA first-round loss to Shady Side Academy, had a bit of a setback this offseason.

Senior quarterback Austin Ross, who was the likely replacement for graduate Christian Herstine, broke his ankle the first week of June and isn't expected to return until mid-September. Last year, Ross scored twice on 114 yards rushing, and completed 8 of 24 passing attempts for 142 yards. Alex Rowse will fill in. In addition, Beaver returns seven defensive starters and five on the front line.

“We preach effort and wanting to compete at this point and just trying to create competitive situations for our guys,” Beltz said. “If we do that, usually the other aspects fall in line.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.