Carmichaels coach implores seniors to take charge
When the seniors let him down, Carmichaels coach John Menhart turned to his underclassmen last season, many of whom now are seniors.
“Our key is our senior leadership,” Menhart said. “We're not going to dwell on last year. We lacked senior leadership. I challenged them to step up, and it didn't happen.”
The result was a regression by Carmichaels, which is hoping to improve on a 4-5 record and make a return to the WPIAL playoffs, where it last appeared in 2010.
“We lost probably six seniors who played a lot, but we can replace them,” Menhart said. “We'll be more athletic this year.
“We've always taken pride in competing here, but it just didn't happen last year. The team goes as the seniors go.
“The biggest disappointment was that our linemen didn't get it done.”
Running backs Brennan McMinn and Josh Mundell head a list of returnees. The two combined to rush for nearly 1,000 yards, though Mundell, a senior, missed time with a broken arm.
As a sophomore last year, McMinn was Carmichaels' leading rusher with 758 yards on 164 carries.
“We have some good seniors, and we have a good junior class,” Menhart said.
If the line, which will be led by seniors Mike Mitchell and Luke Moskal and junior Joel Tekar, can protect quarterback Brandon Lawless, Carmichaels will look to mix an effective passing game with what Menhart hopes will be a strong ground attack.
It all could lead to a return to the postseason for the Mikes.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.