Riverview's Malky picks Akron
Riverview pitcher Anthony Malky, one of the WPIAL leaders in strikeouts this spring, gave the OK to Akron on Friday.
Malky, who struck out 85 batters in 52 innings while going 6-2 with a 0.95 ERA as a junior, gave a verbal commitment to the Division I university. He also had scholarship offers from Buffalo, Rider and William & Mary.
“This is a weight off my shoulders,” he said. “Now I don't have to focus on myself so much.”
Malky said one of the greatest attractions Akron offers is the chance to be a contributor right off the bat.
“They said I'll definitely be pitching my freshman year,” Malky said. “I'll probably be worked into the starting rotation. To be a starter, I think there's a pretty good chance.”
Malky said he liked several other things about Akron, including the chance to learn from pitching coach Matt Ford, who played for the Milwaukee Brewers in 2003; the opportunity to compete in a Division I conference with parity; the proximity to his family; the Zips' home of Lee R. Jackson Baseball Field; and the team's indoor practice facility.
Malky throws a fastball that's been clocked at 91 mph as well as a changeup, curveball and slider. He also hit .468 as a junior.
This summer, he's pitching for the Pittsburgh Diamond Dawgs, an elite travel team.
“I know he wanted to get this all taken care of,” Riverview coach Rich Griser said. “An awful lot of schools have been after him.”
Paul Kogut is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.