Share This Page

Ford City boys golf team deep and balanced

| Friday, Aug. 17, 2012, 1:23 a.m.
Ford City senior Joe Cippel (left) consults with junior Matt Klingensmith, who lines up a putt during a practice round at Lenape Heights Golf Course on Thursday, Aug. 16, 2012.
Ford City senior Andrew Labutka watches his putt during a practice round at Lenape Heights Golf Course on Thursday, Aug. 16, 2012. (Bill West | Leader Times)

There's no big-hitting, birdie-making star on Ford City's boys golf team this season, but the Sabers' depth should test even the best opponents in Section 1-AA.

All six starters return, and a few new additions give Ford City ample options for its five-man scores. Whether any Saber will consistently come close to par is uncertain. But first-year coach Joe Cali and his golfers believe there's no shortage of shooters who can stay in the 40s for nine holes.

“Really, any day, any one of our six can shoot a No. 1 score,” senior Andrew Labutka said. “It just depends who gets hot.”

Labutka, Joe Cippel and Jesse Valasek are back after serving as reliable juniors a year ago, when Ford City finished above .500 but missed the team playoffs. They enter their final season with increased confidence. But none are too concerned where they'll land in the lineup.

“Personally, I like playing three or four because there's less pressure,” Cippel said. “But it doesn't really matter.”

Cali said for now, the No. 1 spot belongs to junior Chuck Cippel, who proved himself as the steadiest player during the summer. He regularly shot in the low 40s and did not exceed 45.

“That's what he brings, consistency,” Cali said. “His mental game is there. He's patient. … He's mature beyond his years.”

Chuck Cippel credits a more cerebral approach to the game for his respectable average, which he hopes will crack the high 30s by midseason.

“Last year, I was all about driving the ball far,” he said. “Then I realized that's not really what this game is about. The guys who do well are good around the green.”

Cali has made it his mission to convince every Saber about the importance of deliberation. Club selection, shot placement, risk-reward analysis — these are the means by which Cali believes he can help his golfers lower their averages.

“It's an ongoing process,” he said. “They look at golf differently as kids than I do as an adult. But it's working so far.”

Junior John Phelps and sophomore Josh Oliver are two more returning starters with the potential to score in the low 40s. Cali identified Oliver as a particularly composed underclassman.

Added to the relatively proven collection of returning starters are two former Elderton starters, junior Matt Klingensmith and Caige Crissman. Both continue to adjust to life at Lenape Heights Golf Course, which is more challenging than Elderton's home course, White Oak in Dayton.

“It's a good thing, though,” Klingensmith said. “It'll make me a better golfer.”

Freshman Luke Gross, though untested in varsity match play, has impressed Cali and gives Ford City yet another option as a fourth or fifth score.

Ford City's objective, according to Cali, is to finish with at least three scores in the low 40s. With so many options in his lineup, Cali finds his odds favorable, especially if the Sabers follow the better-safe-than-sorry philosophy.

“Golf is such a goofy game; any one of them could blow up after a shot,” Cali said. “So I just want them to contend. If they hit a bad shot, I want them to be able to move on and forget about it.”

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at wwest@tribweb.com or 724-543-1303 Ext. 1321.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.