Fox Chapel girls soccer optimistic as year starts
Last season, the Fox Chapel Area High School girls soccer team fell just short of claiming the Section 3-AAA title.
The Foxes finished at 9-2-1 in the section and 14-4-1 overall.
Despite losing four seniors, coach Erik Duffy is optimistic.
“So far, so good,” he said. “We've done well in our scrimmages. We scored five goals against Deer Lakes in a scrimmage that was cut to 32 minutes because of the weather.
“We also scrimmaged Butler and won, 1-0. We're returning some valuable players from last year.”
Chief among those are all-section players Jessie Thiessen (F), a senior, and juniors Lauren Kelly (C/Mid) and Theresa Scheiffarth (C/Back).
“They are strong players that know the game well,” Duffy said.
Also returning is four-year starter Yayoi Furuhata (C/Mid), junior defenders Sarah Friedland and Celine Leone, junior Janelle DeBaldo (M/Def) and sophomore Emma Slevin (Mid).
Duffy has 20 players on the team and many of them are freshmen.
“We have a very good freshman class coming in and we may be starting three or four of them,” he said.
One of the freshmen who will be starting will be goalkeeper Elayna Burdelski.
“It's tough having a freshman starting in goal but we're confident in Elayna,” Duffy said. “We're looking for her to keep getting better with each game.”
The Foxes will be seeing some new opponents in their section games this year. Penn Hills, Plum, Gateway and Woodland Hills remain in the section. Allderdice and Oakland Catholic have been added.
“There's a lot of talent in our section,” Duffy said. “We feel that we have the talent to compete.”
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.