Share This Page

Strong defense helps Valley upset No. 7 Freeport

| Friday, Sept. 21, 2012, 11:38 p.m.
Valley News Dispatch
Valley's Demetrius Houser (No. 6) and Marcus Davenport (No. 56) celebrate a fumble recovery late in the fourth quarter against Freeport on Friday, Sept. 21, 2012, at Valley Memorial Stadium in New Kensington. Jason Bridge | Valley News Dispatch
Valley News Dispatch
Valley's Jaden Walker (4) fights off Freeport's Damon Smith during their game at Valley Memorial Stadium in New Kensington on Friday, September 21, 2012. Jason Bridge | Valley News Dispatch

Valley first-year coach Chad Walsh said his team gained an identity Friday night.

And with it, one of the program's biggest wins in recent history, a win that had students storming the turf and Vikings fans reveling in an Allegheny Conference upset.

Demetrious Houser ran for 111 yards, Jaden Walker added 62 in his first action of the season and new kicker Steve Colagrande made the most of his first field-goal attempt as Valley stunned Class AA No. 7 Freeport, 9-8, at Valley Memorial Stadium.

“To beat a team of that caliber on our home field, I'm still numb,” Walsh said. “We found out a lot of good things about our team tonight. The kids believed.”

Valley (2-2, 2-2) is 2-0 at home. The other win, 14-7 over Deer Lakes in Week 1, snapped a 22-game losing streak.

On Friday, a game slowed by penalties and late clock resets only prolonged a trying night for Freeport (3-1, 3-1), which was held to 49 total yards, including 10 passing. The Yellowjackets lost four fumbles and seemed out of sorts.

“We didn't have that look in our eyes tonight,” Freeport coach John Gaillot said. “Their team wanted it more. We played with little physicality. We had way too many three-and-outs.”

A game where the head-turning result overshadowed any of its individual plays came down to which team could hold on to the ball and outlast the other.

“We knew we were capable of beating them, but give Freeport credit. They played well,” said Houser, who needed only nine carries to top the 100 yards. “We know if we're going to make it to the playoffs, we'll need to win conference games.”

An uneventful, somewhat fidgety first half saw both teams commit two turnovers. Freeport lost a pair of fumbles — recovered by Valley's Chaz Cheatham and Brandon VanTine — and Valley lost a fumble and had a pass intercepted.

The interception by Fred Pastoria went for a 50-yard touchdown. Zane Geist snared the two-point pass from Brendan Lynch for an 8-0 Freeport lead at the half.

But Houser turned the second play of the second half into a 55-yard touchdown, racing down the far sideline. The conversion pass failed, and the Vikings trailed, 8-6, with 11:23 to play in the third.

The score stayed that way until Colagrande, following a fumble recovery by teammate Dale Lasko, make a field goal from 26 yards to make the score 9-8 with 7:18 left in the third.

Colagrande, who missed last week's game with an illness, also attempted a 41-yarder with about six minutes left but was wide left.

A soccer player, Colagrande was urged to try out or football by Valley's athletic trainer two weeks ago.

“The guys on this team never surprise me,” Colagrande said. “They knew they could win this game.”

Valley held its ground in the fourth, applying constant pressure to Lynch before forcing another fumble, which Valley's Terrell Fields scooped up with three minutes left.

“We weren't going to let their quarterback beat us,” Walsh said. “We knew we couldn't allow the big play.”

Valley faced a fourth-and-1 on its final possession ,but a face-mask penalty on Freeport all but sealed the win.

Walker, who hadn't played due to personal reasons, ran 22 times. He gained 49 yards in the second half.

Bill Beckner Jr. is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can he reached at 724-224-2696 or bbeckner@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.