Share This Page

Norwin girls get past Franklin Regional in overtime

| Monday, Sept. 17, 2012, 11:10 p.m.
Franklin Regional's Haley Zeliff and Norwin's Abby Churchfield battle for possession during a game at Franklin Regional on Monday, September 17, 2012. Brian F. Henry | Tribune-Review

Micayla Livingston might only be a freshman, but she has already become an impact player for the Norwin girls soccer team.

And the Knights needed all the impact they could get in the first of their two meetings this season with Franklin Regional.

Livingston scored her sixth goal in as many games when she snuck a shot past Franklin Regional (5-2-0, 4-1-0) goalkeeper Kristen Moore at 2:11 of overtime to give Norwin (5-0-1, 3-0-0) a 2-1 victory over the Panthers.

“In the first two minutes of overtime, we had two opportunities, and we were bound to get one eventually,” Norwin coach Jeff Palm said. “Luckily, it went in.”

It was also a somewhat controversial goal.

Livingston came down the right side, broke into the box and snapped a quick shot at the right post that Moore appeared to smother. But the referee on the left side of the field signaled the ball had gotten past her, went over the goal line and that the Panthers netminder had pulled it out.

“She said her shoulder was on the line, and she thought the referee had a bad angle. But hey, he's the referee, and he makes the call,” Franklin Regional coach Rich Garland said. “Norwin is one of the teams that we really want to compete against, and I was really pleased with the level of play. We competed with them, so it's going to be nice to see them at their place.”

Prior to the goal being scored, Moore made several impressive stops from point-blank range, one on Livingston just 1:01 into the overtime and one on senior forward Rachel DelleFemine just 31 seconds later. Instead of turning away and pulling back, however, Norwin continued to press the attack before Livingston finally capitalized.

“We seem to be a really good second half team and most of our games so far, we've been a little slow coming out,” Palm said. “But they flip a switch and they turn it on in the second half.”

Considering the way the two teams were playing in the first 30 minutes, it appeared Franklin Regional might have gotten the only goal it would need with 9:58 remaining in the first half.

Franklin Regional forward Courtney Hanchey broke down the right wing side of the pitch, and just as she hit the top of the box, Norwin goalkeeper Cayla Imbarlina streaked out of the net to challenge the ball. Imbarlina was called for a foul on the play and the Panthers were given a penalty kick.

Imbarlina went back into the net, but she couldn't stop the shot by Franklin Regional striker Jacqueline Cepicka, who drove the ball just inside the left post at shoulder height for the opening goal to give the Panthers a 1-0 lead.

Before Franklin Regional had an opportunity to tighten its defense, Norwin answered with a goal of its own.

On the Knights, next trip down the field, a player was fouled on the right football sideline near the 20-yard line ,and the team was given a direct free kick. Norwin set up its entire attack on the left side of the box, and when DelleFemine hit a rolling shot into the box, senior Brea Bolden chipped it past Moore at 31:35 to tie the game, 1-1, which was how it stayed through the intermission.

Keith Barnes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at kbarnes@tribweb.com or 412-664-9161 Ext. 1977.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.