ShareThis Page

Sto-Rox QB does it all in win over OLSH

| Friday, Sept. 21, 2012, 10:36 p.m.
Sto-Rox quarterback Lenny Williams ran and passed for more than 100 yards versus Clairton in a WPIAL Class A title game loss.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Christopher Horner
Sto-Rox quarterback Lenny Williams ran and passed for more than 100 yards versus Clairton in a WPIAL Class A title game loss. Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review

Sto-Rox was far from perfect Friday night.

Thanks to some key injuries to their opponent, the Vikings didn't have to be.

Lenny Williams had 103 rushing yards and threw touchdown passes to Brendan Blair and Ben Shackelford, as host Sto-Rox beat a depleted Our Lady of Sacred Heart team, 35-14, on Friday night.

“We're happy with the outcome but really not pleased with how we got there,” Vikings coach Dan Bradley said. “Too many mistakes, too many penalties, too many missed alignments and missed assignments.”

The Chargers entered the game without their starting quarterback, Billy Mulcahey, whom OLSH officials said was injured during practice this week and experiencing concussion-like symptoms.

That was going to make things difficult enough on a fledgling program in its third WPIAL season that was out to upset a reigning WPIAL Class A finalist. But the devastating blow for the Chargers was when Isiah Neely was lost for the game with a badly sprained right ankle after running for a 6-yard touchdown that gave OLSH a 7-0 lead 3 minutes, 27 seconds into the contest.

Neely was relegated to watching on the sidelines in a T-shirt and on crutches during the second half. He had accounted for 74 percent of the Chargers' offense entering the game. His 1,557 yards rushing last season ranked 10th in the WPIAL.

“(Neely's injury) limited them because they rely so much on him,” Bradley said.

Sto-Rox (3-1, 3-1 Big Seven) was slow to take advantage. The Vikings committed nine penalties for 95 yards and dropped five passes in the first half alone. They finished with 13 penalties for 115 yards and three fumbles.

“We're happy with the win, but obviously we're disappointed with how we played,” Williams said. “They're a good team, but playing against great teams, you can't have all those mistakes.”

Still, Sto-Rox led, 14-7, at the half because of its stable of playmakers. Blair had a nifty 17-yard touchdown reception from in the first quarter, and Elisha Bonner gave Sto-Rox the lead for good with a 5-yard touchdown midway through the second.

Blair extended the lead to 21-7 with a 6-yard touchdown in the third quarter.

The Chargers showed some life after that. Forty-two seconds later, Zack Woznichak sprinted 61 yards for a touchdown, and OLSH forced a Sto-Rox fumble on the first play of the ensuing drive.

“I was very proud of the way the rest of the team responded,” OLSH coach Bill Daniels said. “They didn't hang their heads. (Neely is) the heart and soul of this team, but they sucked it up and were very competitive to the end.”

But despite taking over at the Vikings' 30 with a chance to tie the game, OLSH could not score.

Shackelford had a 60-yard punt return for a touchdown and a 33-yard touchdown reception to put the game away in the fourth quarter.

Plagued by drops, Williams finished 7 for 19. Blair had 87 yards from scrimmage.

OLSH backup quarterback Joe Sebes went 2 for 6 for 35 yards.

Chris Adamski is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.