ShareThis Page

Ligonier Valley Rams top Bobcats, edge Red Dragons

| Friday, Oct. 5, 2012, 12:05 a.m.
Bill Pribisco
Ligonier’s Rachel Wallace (right) sends a spiked ball back to Purchase line with teammates (from left) Kyra Ludwig, Hannah Yeskey and Tabor Hall looking on. The photo was taken by Bill Pribisco Sept. 27, 2012 at the Ligonier Valley High School gym. Bill Pribisco | for the Ligonier Echo

The Ligonier Valley Rams volleyball team earned two Heritage Conference victories last week over the Blairsville Bobcats, 3-1 and held off the Purchase Line Red Dragons, 3-2.

The Bobcats came to Ligonier Sept. 25 and Rebecca Kromel started things off for the Rams with two aces. Rachel Wallace followed up with a dig shot. But despite multiple kills in the game from Tabor Hall and Kyra Ludwig, the Blairsville team won the first set, 25-18.

In the second game, Hall made a kill, another back row winner from Wallace also a couple of Kromel kills kept them up 12-11. From there Amanda Ross picked up two blocks and a kill from the middle with Ludwig and Hall continuing strong play. Wallace served two aces, then Taylor Rudnik came off the bench to add two kills, including the game winner to make it 25-16.

The Rams were solid in the third set, powered by eight kills from Ludwig. Once again Rudnik added two late winners and Ligonier Valley won, 25-13. The Rams pulled away again in the fourth game, helped early on by an aimed kill from Ross and two consecutive aces from setter Hannah Yeskey, who also had winners later in the game on a tip shot and a fake set, the latter set up by a dig from Courtney Lear. Kromel contributed two aces as well. Yeskey aced the winning point to make the final 25-15, giving Ligonier Valley a 3-1 victory.

Purchase Line visited Ligonier Sept. 27 and the Rams pulled away for a 25-12 first set win. The game ended with kills from Ross and Jeanne Markosky. The second game started off 3-0 for Ligonier Valley, but had a different tone from there as Purchase Line was able to hold off the Rams. The game featured great winners from the front row and defensive play from Wallace, but the Red Dragons tied the match with a 25-22 victory.

Ligonier Valley jumped out to a 7-1 lead in the third set with consecutive kills from Ross. Markosky added a block and a kill for the 25th point of the game, which ended with the Rams on top, 25-20.

In the fourth set Ligonier Valley fell behind early on, but the home team fought back to tie the game on two consecutive aces from Hall and then take the lead, 15-14, on a block from Yeskey. From that point, neither team could get ahead by greater than two points. Kromel had two kills and Wallace had a back row kill. Markosky added a kill and a fake set from Yeskey put the Rams up 22-21. From there the game became a battle of endurance, it was finally Purchase Line who put together two points in a row taking the set 32-30 and tying the match at 2-2.

The pivotal game began with Ligonier Valley up 9-5. Kill shots from Kromel and digs from Wallace kept the Rams ahead. Up 14-10 on a Ludwig tip shot, but Purchase Line rallied to tie it up at 14-14. Ludwig was set up by Yeskey for a kill to make it 15-14 and Ross blocked over the final point. The Rams won the game 16-14 and the match 3-2.

Ligonier Valley is back in action Monday with a non-conference match at Indiana.

Doug Kurtz is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.