Share This Page

Fox Chapel trounces Shaler for 1st win

| Saturday, Sept. 29, 2012, 12:34 a.m.

After going winless in its first four games, Fox Chapel was looking for anyone to give its offense a spark. Instead, three running backs provided the impetus that let the Foxes end their slide.

Identical twins Nigel and Chad Garnett and Carrington Vaughn each ran for more than 100 yards as Fox Chapel earned its first win of the season, a 49-14 victory against Shaler in Quad North play Friday night in Fox Chapel.

“They deserve it. They've been working hard,” Fox Chapel coach Eric Ravotti said. “It's a testament to the offensive line for blocking better than they had the first four games. Hopefully this gives them the confidence to continue to get better each week, because the opponents we have are good every week.”

The Fox Chapel offensive line was assertive all night, creating big holes from the opening drive. After forcing a three-and-out on Shaler's opening possession, Fox Chapel (1-4, 1-3) went 71 yards on three plays and took an early lead on Chad Garnett's 34-yard run.

The Shaler offense flowed through senior quarterback Brad Good, who threw for 100 yards and ran for 45. With his team trailing, 21-0, in the second quarter, he gave the Titans (0-4, 0-5) a boost by carrying the ball 40 yards before lateraling to lineman Nick Carey.

Carey barreled the final 2 yards into the end zone for the first of his two rushing touchdowns.

“Brad's just an athletic kid who makes plays, and he's getting better,” Shaler coach Chris Siegle said. “I don't know if (Carey) has ever scored a touchdown in his life before tonight. When it was his chance to make a play and his time to take advantage of an opportunity, he did.”

Fox Chapel contained Good for the most part, particularly on option plays. The Foxes' offense, meanwhile, continued to rack up huge chunks of yardage.

By halftime, the Garnett brothers had rushed for 171 of Fox Chapel's 222 yards of offense and scored three of its four touchdowns. For the game, Nigel finished with nine carries for 123 yards and a touchdown, and Chad carried the ball 10 times for 101 yards and two scores.

“They're incredibly quick and fast, and they have great vision,” Ravotti said. “Carrington Vaughn is a downhill, smash-mouth type of running back. It gives you a good combination.”

Vaughn, typically one of Fox Chapel's two starting running backs, didn't get his first carry until the second half. But when it came — on the first snap of the third quarter — he made it count. His 61-yard run down the right sideline set up the first of his three rushing touchdowns three plays later.

He finished with 105 yards on 10 carries, all in the second half.

“We changed a few things up to try to take advantage of some of the offense we have,” Ravotti said. “We played better this week offensively than we have in the past.”

Stephen Catanese is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.