Freeport's Clawson aims for putt cutback at WPIALs
Freeport freshman Audrey Clawson knows if she is going to keep playing in the WPIAL and PIAA postseason, she'll need to keep her putts to a minimum.
That's why she has spent extra time on her short game, chipping and putting daily as she gets set to make her debut in the WPIAL Class AA girls golf championship Monday at Three Lakes Golf Course in Penn Hills.
“I am doing all I can to get closer to the pin; that's something I need to improve on,” said Clawson, who has had a head-turning season on the Freeport boys team. “I need to be able to one-putt when I am in that 4- to 5-foot range.”
She has been among the team's top five scorers in almost every match and helped the Yellowjackets to a team section title.
Clawson shot 88 to take second behind Neshannock freshman Marissa Kirkwood in the Section 1-AA qualifier at Kittanning Country Club two weeks ago. The score, nine strokes greater than Kirkwood's, did not satisfy Clawson, who kept her nine-hole average under 40 at the start of the year.
“I didn't play as smart of golf as I wanted to,” Clawson said. “It was just careless mistakes, not taking the safe shot when I should have.”
Clawson visited 3 Lakes Golf Course for a practice round Aug. 21. At each hole, she used a driver, a 5-wood, and a 27-degree hybrid.
In most cases, the freshman said, the hybrid had the best outcome — her hybrid tee shots sail about 175 yards when hit straight.
For Clawson, conservative play in the tee box and clean putting might suffice. The top eight finishers in the WPIAL Class AA final advance to the PIAA Western Regional — the state championship qualifier — Oct. 15 at Tom's Run Golf Course in Blairsville.
Bill Beckner is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 724-224-2696.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.