Share This Page

Bishop Canevin respects Clairton but won't be in awe

| Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2012, 11:43 p.m.
Clairton running back Tyler Boyd breaks away during a game against California on Sept. 14, 2012. Ronald Vezzani Jr./ for the Daily News
Christopher Horner
Clairton's Terrish Webb scores the Bears' first touchdown against Southern Columbia during the first quarter of the PIAA Class A state championship game Friday, Dec. 16, 2011, at Hersheypark Stadium. Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Bishop Canevin's head coach Bob Jacoby on Monday August 13, 2012. Sidney Davis | Tribune-Review

Football teams are creatures of habit during the season.

They follow detailed weekly schedules, starting with a film session of the previous game and finishing with a walk-through before the next.

This week things will be different for Trib Total Media Class A No. 5 Bishop Canevin (5-1, 5-1) and No. 1 Clairton (6-0, 6-0), as they have an extra day of practice in advance of their 7 p.m. Saturday kickoff.

The Crusaders couldn't have asked for a better time to get 24 more hours of prep time.

“They give you so many different looks offensively with people at two or three different positions, and you have to prepare for where they're going to line up,” Bishop Canevin coach Bob Jacoby said. “It's beneficial in that respect.”

Considering just how dominant Clairton has been since its Week 1 scare against Chartiers-Houston, the team might have earned an extra day off this week. After all, the Bears have outscored their past five opponents, 263-27, and have had a running clock in the second half of all five games.

Then again, the players know that might be a bad idea.

“We're not getting a day off, and we don't really want it,” Clairton senior receiver Terrish Webb said. “If we get a day off, we might get a little lazy or something.”

Clairton remains the top-ranked team in the WPIAL and state and enters the game riding a nation's-best 53-game winning streak. Though many teams have been in awe and even a bit deferential to the Bears during this run, Bishop Canevin is taking a different tack in an effort to motivate its players and keep the reverence in check.

“It's not just another opponent. It's a great opportunity, and these kinds of opportunities don't come along all the time,” Jacoby said. “You're going to play one of the greatest teams in WPIAL history and coming up on the state record, and there's a great opportunity to make a name for yourself. You can't be overwhelmed by what they have accomplished. You have to look at it like what you can accomplish, and it's going to take a masterful game.”

That may be an understatement.

After allowing 20 points to Chartiers-Houston in the opener — the most Clairton has given up in a regular-season game since a 50-21 win over Avonworth on Oct. 26, 2007, and more than they allowed in the entire 2010 and 2011 regular seasons — the Bears not allowed more than seven points in any game. Their lowest scoring output since the opener was last week, when they scored 42 in a 35-point win over Brentwood.

Bishop Canevin, meanwhile, rebounded well with a 32-point victory over Fort Cherry after a heartbreaking loss to Monessen.

“That first game was pretty much a wake-up call that every team we're going to play, they're going to come out and play their hardest,” Webb said. “That just means that we have to play hard, too, and with no games off.”

And apparently no days off, either.

Keith Barnes is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at kbarnes@tribweb.com or 412-664-9161 Ext. 1977.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.