ShareThis Page

Norwin preps for conference finale on Friday

| Wednesday, Oct. 17, 2012, 8:55 p.m.
Casey Rebosky, shown during Norwin's game against Connellsville on Friday, Sept. 28, 2012, at Norwin Knights Stadium, scored one of the Knights' two touchdowns against Gateway last Friday.
Lillian DeDomenic | For The Norwin Star
(c) 2012 Lillian DeDomenic
Casey Rebosky, shown during Norwin's game against Connellsville on Friday, Sept. 28, 2012, at Norwin Knights Stadium, scored one of the Knights' two touchdowns against Gateway last Friday. Lillian DeDomenic | For The Norwin Star

Norwin's football team has made steady improvement throughout the season, but the Knights aren't yet ready to take down the district's elite.

Quad East co-leader and Class AAAA No. 2 Gateway showed why it is atop the conference by pulling away early from Norwin in a 62-14 win Friday night in Monroeville.

The deep ball gave the Knights (1-6, 1-6) problems all night, as quarterback Thomas Woodson finished with 278 yards and five touchdowns on 10-for-13 passing for the Gators (6-1, 6-0), but Norwin head coach Art Tragesser wasn't displeased with his team, which had to battle injuries and some physical mismatches in the contest.

“They're a real good team, and we couldn't match up with their speed. We did scrimmage North Hills and Mt. Lebanon, who are real good teams, but the hard part preparing for Gateway is duplicating their speed in practice,” Tragesser said.

“It was a great learning experience for our kids. We lost several defensive backs and had kids that were starting for the first time. I was glad to see them get a chance to play and get that experience.”

Norwin's two touchdowns came courtesy of a 42-yard run by senior Casey Rebosky and a fumble recovery in the end zone by sophomore defensive back Zeke Kljucaric, both of which came in the second half.

“The kids did some really good things Friday night, even if it didn't always show up on the scoreboard,” Tragesser said. “A lot of them are going to be around for two more years, so they just need to keep playing hard and trying to improve their performance.”

The Knights close out their 2012 schedule with two home games, the first of which is their final Quad East game against Hempfield this Friday at 7:30 p.m.

Norwin could play spoiler for the Spartans (3-4, 3-3), who are in the mix for a playoff spot despite dropping their last three games, the most recent to Butler in a nonconference game, 23-10, last Friday.

Injuries in the backfield have played a role in Hempfield's recent slide, as leading rusher Joey DeFloria has been out for the past three games, while other Spartans runners have missed time this season, as well.

Starting quarterback Ty George and dual-threat quarterback/running back DeLorian Day have been leading the Hempfield offense, and they have the benefit of working behind one of the biggest offensive lines in the conference.

“They have a lot of kids coming back from last year that played. They have an established quarterback, a good running game and a big line. They're way bigger than we are,” Tragesser said. “We're just going to have to bounce back from that loss and play a great game to try and win this week.”

The Spartans likely will need one more win to reach the playoffs, either against the Knights or in their finale against Penn-Trafford. Norwin, with the loss to Gateway and other Friday night results, was officially eliminated from playoff contention, as its final game of the season is a nonconference meeting with Shaler.

Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.