ShareThis Page

West Shamokin volleyball team bows out of PIAA playoffs

| Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2012, 12:01 a.m.

Boys in Maplewood's lively student section drove home the message delivered by PIAA first-round match officials as they chanted “You still can't do that!” and “Check the rulebook” throughout the night Tuesday at Cochranton High School to mock West Shamokin's hitting violations.

Twelve double-hit calls, six net violations and four lift calls contributed to the Wolves' 3-1 loss to the District 10 champion Tigers in the opening round of the Class A state tournament.

West Shamokin finished with 47 unforced errors, but the betrayal of seemingly elementary skills proved especially frustrating for the team, which won the first game, 25-22, but dropped the next three (25-11, 25-20, 25-23).

“I think that we've been receiving higher-caliber officials as the season went along, and they started calling (hitting violations),” Wolves coach Justin Nolder said. “I don't want to say we were not doing it throughout the season — we were. We just weren't seeing playoff-caliber officials, so they simply did not call it, and that came back to bite us.”

The Wolves trailed, 21-19, in Game 1 when they played arguably their cleanest ball of the contest. Kills by Kelly Clowser and Jill Glover tied the score. Three unforced Maplewood errors gave West Shamokin a 24-22 lead. And then Kristen Templeton's serve hit the net and dribbled over for a game-winning ace.

“We just needed to settle in,” Maplewood coach Sheila Bancroft said. “That's not the first time that we've had to come from behind to win, unfortunately.”

Serving — and serve reception — became a weakness for West Shamokin. Most glaringly, the second and third games ended with bad serves.

But settled play included maddening moments, too, particularly for setter Jen Notto. Notto managed to distribute the ball to Glover (14 kills), Amanda Wensel (five kills) and Clowser (four kills). But during each of the first three games, the whistle sounded at least three times for double hits.

“It was purely a technique issue,” Nolder said. “It's a simple adjustment, getting your forehead to the ball … using your entire body to push it to where you're going to distribute the ball.”

Even when the Wolves avoided double-hit violations, they often found themselves on the receiving end of a blast by sophomore outside hitter Madalyn Nichols, who had 22 kills, including the match-winner.

Wensel and Alecia Calhoun had some success with blocking; they combined for five stuffs for points. Their partial blocks allowed West Shamokin to assemble one last rally as it recovered from a 20-10 deficit in Game 4 and climbed as close as 24-23.

“I tried to calm them down a little bit (afterward) and have them really look back on the accomplishments of the season in getting here, and how nobody at the beginning of the season penciled us in this tournament,” Nolder said. “We found ways to make it happen, and now we're here, and that's sometime to be proud of.”

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or 724-543-1303.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.