PIAA denies Lincoln Park basketball player Minnie's transfer
Lincoln Park basketball player Elijah Minnie again was declared ineligible Thursday when the PIAA upheld an earlier ruling by the WPIAL.
The 6-foot-8 junior, who previously attended Monessen and Summitt Academy, transferred to the charter school in Midland before this school year, a move the WPIAL found was made with athletic intent. A five-member PIAA hearing panel in Mechanicsburg confirmed that finding Thursday afternoon with a 3-2 vote, said Lincoln Park athletic director Mike Bariski, who believed the issue might bring further action.
“I would call it close to a travesty,” Bariski said. “Everything that Monessen provided we refuted with evidence ... but they still ruled him ineligible.”
Minnie attended Monessen as a freshman. He spent last school year at Summit Academy, a school in Butler County for delinquent youth, where he averaged 15.5 points for the basketball team. He then transferred to Lincoln Park, a performing arts school in Beaver County with a successful basketball program.
Monessen, his home district, contested the transfer.
“It was a blatant case of recruiting for athletic intent, and we simply could not stand back and let that happen,” Monessen athletic director Gina Naccarato said. “I feel sorry for Elijah, but what Lincoln Park did was wrong. We had to stand up against it.”
The WPIAL's board was unanimous when declaring Minnie ineligible in October but rarely of late has the PIAA supported the WPIAL's transfer rulings.
“The decision to uphold District 7's decision just reaffirms our findings,” said North Hills athletic director Dan Cardone, a member of the WPIAL and PIAA boards.
Jeff Oliver contributed to this report. Chris Harlan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.