Sewickley Academy girls return two starters for rebuilding campaign
With only two returning starters, the Sewickley Academy girls basketball team is rebuilding this year.
The Panthers have two scrimmages before meeting host and archrival Shady Side Academy at the Shady Side Academy Tip-Off Tournament on Dec. 7.
Sewickley Academy lost seven players to graduation, as well as a girl who decided not to return this season.
Most players are freshmen and sophomores. There is only one senior.
Coach Allen Vaccarelli has modest expectations.
“We are working hard in the gym to better our team as a whole,” he said. “Our goal is to work hard and get better with each practice.
“If we are better today than we were yesterday, then we are heading in the right direction.”
Point guard Haylee “Nudge” Vaccarelli, the coach's daughter, was among the players lost. A four-year starter, she led the team in assists and steals and was second in scoring and third in rebounding last year.
Rachel Pregel, the Panthers' leading scorer, also graduated. Pregel was second in rebounding and steals a year ago.
Junior forward Katelyn Ripple and senior guard-forward Amanda Nocera are top returnees. The team's leading rebounder, Ripple, averaged eight rebounds and five points per game last season.
Nocera averaged five points and four rebounds a game.
Juniors Mackenzie Pryor and Amanda McCleod and sophomore Riley Roberts are returning letter winners.
Ripple, 16, looks forward to encouraging younger players.
“We have some really good freshmen coming up,” she said. “I want to show them maneuvers and help them as much as I can.”
Sewickley Academy (9-12 overall) finished sixth in WPIAL Section 1-A last year with a 4-8 record.
Karen Kadilak is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.