ShareThis Page

Gorman: Westinghouse, Wilkinsburg aiming for acceptance

Kevin Gorman
| Tuesday, Dec. 8, 2015, 10:40 p.m.

Westinghouse and Wilkinsburg played for keeps Saturday, then traded handshakes for hugs and posed together for pictures.

That scene at the Sto-Rox tip-off tournament touched not only Bulldogs coach Phyllis Jones but her counterpart, Wilfred Dennis.

“It was spontaneous and it was nice to see that the girls were willing to do it on both ends,” said Jones, the legendary Westinghouse girls basketball coach. “You don't always get that agreement on both ends. It's almost like we're like family.”

Next year, they will be.

When Wilkinsburg closes at the end of the school year, its students are scheduled to attend Westinghouse next fall.

Jones dealt with a similar scenario when Peabody closed in 2011 but hopes the Tigers' seven underclassmen join her team. So she was extra careful not to be critical when coaching against them in a 43-24 Westinghouse victory.

“I was a little cautious of my wording as far as their players, knowing that I may be coaching them,” said Jones, who taught some of the Tigers' parents at Westinghouse. “You try to stay positive all the way around.”

Dennis, a 1969 Westinghouse alum, hopes their games help the transition. The teams play again Saturday at Westinghouse, then Dec. 19 at Wilkinsburg.

“A lot of people were saying Wilkinsburg going to Westinghouse is going to be a bad scenario, that the kids are going to be fighting 24/7,” Dennis said. “Our kids practice and play against each other. I don't think there's going to be a lot of problems. It looks good for their future, if both teams can bring it all together.”

So far, so good for two teams aiming for acceptance.

Kevin Gorman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at kgorman@tribweb.com or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.