ShareThis Page

Shady Side Academy's Krystyna Rytel setting big goals

| Sunday, July 16, 2017, 11:00 p.m.
Submitted
Shady Side Academy's Krystyna Rytel had 33 goals and 30 assists during the 2016 season.
Submitted
Shady Side Academy's Krystyna Rytel had 33 goals and 30 assists during the 2016 season.

Last year, the Shady Side Academy soccer team featured a high-scoring duo in Elizabeth Harper and Krystyna Rytel as the Indians claimed the WPIAL championship. With Harper graduated, Rytel will be leading the offense.

Rytel, a junior center midfielder who also competes in track, had 33 goals and 30 assists last year. She is confident the Indians will acquit themselves well this season.

“I think with the returning players we have this year, we have the potential to be successful and contend for the WPIAL championship again.”

Along with practicing with the team twice a week this summer, Rytel has been playing for Century V Gold, a club team.

“We just returned from regionals where we won two games and tied the third,” she said. “Unfortunately, this did not put us in a position to move on to nationals.”

In Rytel's first two seasons, the Indians reached the WPIAL Class A semifinals in 2015, followed by last season's championship. Rytel wants to keep upping her game so the success continues.

“What I'm looking to do this summer is improve my speed and increase my ability to make plays in the air,” she said.

Marty Stewart is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.