ShareThis Page

WPIAL boys soccer championship capsule: Springdale vs. Cardinal Wuerl North Catholic

Doug Gulasy
| Thursday, Nov. 2, 2017, 9:54 p.m.

WPIAL boys sOCCER championship

Class A

No. 7 Springdale (15-4-1) vs. No. 1 Cardinal Wuerl North Catholic (19-1)

8 p.m. Friday, Highmark Stadium

Free kicks: The Section 3-A opponents face each other for the third time this season. North Catholic won the first two meetings, 7-1 on Sept. 5 and 1-0 in overtime Sept. 23. ... Springdale is making its first appearance in the WPIAL championship game and is seeking its 10th title, which would be the Dynamos' first since 1973. They won all nine titles between 1961 and 1973. ... The Dynamos advanced to Highmark Stadium with a 4-0 win over No. 10 Serra Catholic, a 2-1 upset over No. 2 Freedom and a 2-1 shootout victory over No. 3 Seton LaSalle. Sophomore defender Matt Taliani delivered the winning shootout goal. ... Three of Springdale's four losses this season came by one goal, with the exception being the first meeting against North Catholic. ... Jared Demore leads Springdale with 25 goals, including the team's only regulation marker against Seton LaSalle. ... The defense, led by goalkeeper Mike Zolnierczyk, has 11 shutouts. ... North Catholic is seeking its first WPIAL championship after falling to Sewickley Academy in the title game last season. ... The Trojans advanced to Highmark Stadium with a 10-0 win over No. 16 Quigley Catholic and 4-0 victories over No. 8 Bentworth and No. 4 Winchester Thurston. ... North Catholic has been one of the most dominant teams in the WPIAL this season, outscoring its opponents, 136-6. The Trojans haven't allowed more than a goal in any game, and their lone loss was a 1-0 defeat to Pine-Richland, a state qualifier in Class AAAA. ... Sophomore Joe Kearney has more than 40 goals this season.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.