ShareThis Page

Bishop Canevin boys soccer ready for Class A playoffs

| Wednesday, Oct. 17, 2012, 8:56 p.m.
Siganl Item
Sean O'Toole, right, and the Bishop Canevin boys soccer team claimed their first section title since 2009 after defeating Seton-La Salle, 1-0, in overtime last week. Randy Jarosz | for the Signal Item
Signal Item
Nick Burton, right, and the Bishop Canevin soccer team got their first win over rival Seton-La Salle since Oct. 20, 2009 last week. Randy Jarosz | for the Signal Item

Just a few weeks ago, a Section 3-A title didn't seem possible for coach Jim Bull and the Bishop Canevin boys soccer team.

On Sept. 25, the Crusaders finished in a 1-1 tie with Carlynton. The tie — along with a 2-1, double-overtime loss to section-leading Seton-La Salle the week before — made it unlikely the squad could fight back to get into the title picture.

“We knew we were a contender when we took (Seton-La Salle) into double overtime,” Bishop Canevin coach Jim Bull said. “We didn't think it was a viable goal after the Carlynton game, though.”

But the Crusaders ended up getting help from the rival Cougars.

Carlynton upset Seton-La Salle, 2-0, on Oct.4, giving the Crusaders and Rebels one section loss each and making their game last week a showdown for the Section 3-A title.

And it was one to remember.

Bishop Canevin's Greg McGuire got the score with only three minutes to go in the second overtime on a penalty kick for a Crusaders 1-0 win. The penalty was caused when a Rebels player handed the ball in the goal box.

“We knew coming in we needed to win the section or we were guaranteed second place,” Bull said. “So we threw it all out on the table. We stuck to our style and got into overtime. We moved some of our better players forward into attacking positions. The pressure was what caused the penalty.

“The defense played great. We defended with our hearts all game.”

The win gave Bishop Canevin its first section title since 2009. That season — also the last season the Crusaders qualified for the postseason — the team went 10-2 in the section and shared the crown with Sewickley Academy.

The Crusaders finished Section 3-A this season with a 10-1-1 mark. Bull credited the defense for coming together this season and giving the Crusaders a chance in each section game. Over the final five section games, the defense was stellar as Bishop Canevin outscored opponents, 19-0.

“At the beginning of the season, we weren't really sure if defense would be a strength or weakness,” Bull said. “But the defenders have shown their ability. The group came together and helped get us where we are. It is a one of our biggest strengths.”

The Crusaders added a 1-0 nonsection win over Our Lady of the Sacred Heart — a team headed to the Class A playoffs out of Section 5. The Crusaders faced Indiana — a Class AA playoff squad — earlier this week as the team prepped for the playoffs. Results were unavailable at press time.

“We want to continue working on the attack,” Bull said. “Just smooth over some of the edges. We want to win the last two nonsection games but not at the expense of health or fitness. So we will be rotating guys in we might not typically.”

Bull said that once the teams from Class A take the field for playoff competition, it will be a battle in each game. He said Sewickley Academy — which is 15-0-1 and the champion of Section 5-A — is the favorite entering the tournament.

After that, anything can happen.

“The way I see it, everyone short of Sewickley Academy is on the same level,” Bull said. “It is wide open. We are right there with everyone.”

Nathan Smith is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or 412-388-5813.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.